PsyArXiv
metadata only
Does Calling an AI Advisor "Agentic" Make People Trust It More? An Online Experiment on Trust and Financial Risk-Taking
AI financial advisors are increasingly presented as autonomous agents that reason and act on their own. Theory suggests that such agency cues should raise perceptions of an AI's ability and integrity, but not its benevolence, and that trust in its ability and integrity should increase willingness to
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does Calling an AI Advisor "Agentic" Make People Trust It More? An Online Experiment on Trust and Financial Risk-Taking#1427573
- A System Dynamics Approach to Modeling Trust Dynamics in Conversational AI#1347973
- AI Use Conditions and Perspective Diversity in Ethical Decision-Making: A Pilot Study of Human Reasoning Processes#1071105
- Explaining AI Agents Through Execution Traces#973672
- From Tool to Agent: How Worker Needs Reorganize Across the Agentic Roles of Workplace AI#1200920
Record · ID 1427456
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive