Springer Nature OA
open access
Formal Specification and Boundary Objects: A Two-Layered Approach to GDPR Specification
Specification remains a major bottleneck for formal verification, all the more when it comes to non-functional properties or if the specification has to be understood by non-technical stakeholders. In this paper, we investigate formal specification from the perspective of boundary objects. A boundar
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Identifying GDPR-Critical Tasks in Business Process Descriptions#680867
- Measuring What a Specification Determines: A Formal Semantic-Block Model and an Execution-Judged Benchmark#471317
- Defining Boundary Knowledge Without Ontology#110508
- Verus-SpecGym: An Agentic Environment for Evaluating Specification Autoformalization#229570
- Toward GDPR-Compliant Socio-Technical Systems: Modeling Language and Reasoning Framework#964674
Record · ID 1428433
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive