Springer Nature OA
open access
Formalizing Rust Contracts
Contracts are crucial for (deductive) verification due to the modularization they enable. While Rust verification has flourished, existing tools do not agree on a common specification or contract language, making interoperability challenging. No formal semantics of Rust contracts or adherence to a c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Corten - Foundational Verification of Rust Programs#927666
- A Complete, Formal Semantics for Rust Source Code#1202422
- Scylla: Translating an Applicative Subset of C to Safe Rust#635296
- Programming Rust#1331029
- Secure input validation in Rust with parsing-expression grammars#264958
Record · ID 1428438
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive