ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Two Airway Devices in Paediatric Patients With Difficult Airway
The aim of current study was to compare Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB) and Glidescope devices in terms of intubation success and duration of intubation in patients under 12 months of age with PRS. In the present study, the investigators found similar initial intubation success rates with Glidescope and FFB. Although further studies are needed to determine the superiority of the two techniques, the investigators believes that advanced airway techniques should be prioritized and can be safely used by reducing the number of interventions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Bougie Use for Improving First-Pass Success in Novice Intubators#1244000
- Nose-close and Abdomen-compression in Pediatric Flexible Bronchoscopy#1259650
- RIFL (Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope) vs. Fiberoptic Bronchoscope#1231237
- A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.#909552
- SV With TTPEE Measurement Predicts Upper Airway Patency in Prolonged Tracheostomy Patients#813550
Record · ID 1431402
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive