ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus and Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation
The aim of this study was to compare the results between transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and trigeminal nerve stimulation with the results obtained from heart rate variability, pulse and blood pressure measurements and to reveal which method is more effective in autonomic nervous system neuromodulation. Hypotheses of the study: H0: Vagus nerve stimulation is more effective than trigeminal nerve simulation in terms of heart rate variability. H1: Trigeminal nerve stimulation is more effective than vagus nerve simulation in terms of heart rate variability.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TMS-evoked Potentials During Aerobic Exercise#1433287
- e-Natureza Project - Affective Validation of Nature Images for Hospital Use#1433289
- Staccato: A Trial of CD4 Guided Treatment Interruption, Compared to Continuous Treatment, for HIV Infection#1433293
- Cannabidiol Expanded Access Study in Medically Refractory Sturge-Weber Syndrome#1433290
- Comparison of Three Different Strategies to Prevent Propofol Induced Pain During Infusion#1433292
Record · ID 1431536
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive