ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
TAVI and Gender Outcomes Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is the commonest form of valvular abnormality in the developed world and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is now widely practiced as in many cases is the preferred treatment option over conventional aortic surgery. Several studies have shown that females have an apparent better outcome with TAVI than males. There are a number of possible reasons as to the apparent favourable benefit of TAVI in women including: having both lower rates of moderate / severe aortic regurgitation and peri-procedural mortality, lower rates of bleeding and renal failure, better patient prosthesis match and recovery of left ventricular function with more favourable left ventricular remodelling. We aim to explore the long term outcomes of TAVI between males and females to try and identify specific tailored treatment options. This data will be useful in providing important information regarding gender differences in patients who are treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Data provided will include long term outcomes and predictors of outcome. The study team will then identify and implement strategies to improve outcomes in patients being treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Sildenafil in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis#454115
- Does Cardiac REhabilitation Improve Functional, Independence, Frailty and Emotional outCOmes Following Trans Catheter Aortic ValvE Replacement?#1075798
- A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of Anti-reflux Versus Standard Ureteral Stents on Male Sexual Function#882943
- Comparative Efficacy of Integrated Stent-Graft versus Conventional Covered Stent-Graft Alone in Type B Aortic Dissection: A Retrospective Study Focusing on Aortic Remodeling and Branch Perfusion.#351616
- Comparison of the PrimAry Long Versus Short Coverage With Drug-Eluting Stents for Long FemoRopopliteal Artery DiseasE (PARADE II): Investigator-initiated Clinical Study#812685
Record · ID 1432075
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive