ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
To Explore the Optimal Dose of Alfentanil for Skull Pin Fixation in Intracranial Surgery
Forty patients were enrolled, and all patients used total intravenous anesthesia (alfentanil-propofol based TIVA) as anesthesia induction and maintenance. According to our experience, patients who underwent intracranial surgery for skull pin fixation used alfentanil 100 ng/ml, while the hemodynamics is relatively stable. Therefore, when this plan is implemented, the patient needs to be under the same depth of anesthesia (monitored by EEG, maintaining a value of 40-60), first start with alfentanil 100 ng/ml, and use the up and down method as adjust 25 ng/ml of concentration of alfentanil each time. An SPI higher than 80 and hyperdynamics (the increased HR and MBP up 20% of baseline or HR\>100bpm and ABP\>180/100mmHg) indicates insufficient analgesia, therefore increase it by 25 ng/ml at the next patient; an SPI lower than 80 and stable hemodynamics (the changes of HR and MBP within 20% of baseline or HR\<50bpm and ABP\<90/50mmHg) indicates that analgesia is acceptable, and the next patient will decrease it by 25 ng/ml during skull pin fixation. If the analgesia is inadequate, increase alfentanil concentration will be prescribed. On the other hand, if analgesia is adequate, however hyperdynamics was noted, beta blocker or calcium channel blocker will be prescribed. If hypotension (ABP\<90/50 mmHg) or bradycardia (HR\<50 bpm) occur, we first stop alfentanil infusion and treated with ephedrine or atropine, respectively. Data collection: HR, MBP, SPI, BIS, systolic pressure variation (SPV), pulse pressure variation (PPV) , concentrations of propofol and alfentanil before 2 mins, during, 5, and 15 mins of skull pin fixation were recorded and analyzed.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reversing the Effects of 2% Lidocaine#1086936
- Comparison of Paravertebral Block With General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery#908320
- Buffered Versus Conventional Local Anesthesia for Pain and Anxiety Reduction in School-Aged Children With Pulpitis#1420022
- US-guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Different Volumes on Postoperative Pain in Hip Replacement Surgeries#1057687
- PENG Block vs FNB + ONB in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery With Contraindications to Neuraxial Anesthesia#870444
Record · ID 1432186
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive