Conceptio › Archive › ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov public full text Public Domain

Comparison and Analysis of Functionality, Safety, Cost-effectiveness, and Environmental Impact of Reprocessed and New Ablation Catheters in Electrophysiological Procedures.

Ivan Zeljkovic · 2026
ClinicalTrials.gov · Datasets · License: Public Domain · 2026
Open Source ↗
catheter-ablationcost-benefit-analysisenvironmental-impactna
This study evaluates whether re-sterilized (reprocessed) ablation catheters are as effective and safe as new ablation catheters when used for electrophysiological procedures. Adult patients scheduled for catheter ablation will be randomly assigned to undergo the procedure using either a new catheter or a re-sterilized catheter, with identical procedural techniques applied in both groups. The study will compare procedural efficiency, safety, costs, and environmental impact between the two approaches. The results may support more sustainable and cost-effective use of medical devices in cardiac electrophysiology.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1432255
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive