ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Saline Solution Versus Voluven®: A Controlled Study of Fluid Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis
Fluid resuscitation of severe sepsis may consist of natural or artificial colloids or crystalloids. There is no evidence-based support for one type of fluid over another. The investigators hypothesis is that fluid resuscitation with Voluven® is advantageous to normal saline solution to improve sublingual microcirculation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Influence of Fluid Removal Using Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration (CVVH) on Intra-abdominal Pressure and Kidney Function#1245373
- Evaluation of Fluid Infusion With LifeFlow for Patients With Suspected Septic Shock#885977
- Volemic Resuscitation in Sepsis and Septic Shock#902686
- Comparison of Balanced Crystalloids and Normal Saline in Septic Patients#1229421
- Crystalloid Versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trials#829374
Record · ID 1433112
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive