ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Continuous Chest Compressions vs AHA Standard CPR of 30:2
The primary aim of the trial is to compare survival to hospital discharge after continuous chest compressions (CCC) versus standard American Heart Association (AHA) recommended cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with interrupted chest compressions (ICC) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA). The primary null hypothesis will be that the rate of survival to hospital discharge is not affected by use of continuous compressions with passive or positive pressure ventilation (intervention group) versus CPR with compressions interrupted for ventilation at a ratio of 30:2 (control group).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Effect of Chest Compression and Ventilation Coordination During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.#1140082
- Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Versus Instant Wave-Free Ratio (iFR)#858247
- Bicarbonate in Patients With Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest#982417
- Impact of Sleep Related Breathing Disorders on Outcomes of Acute Pulmonary Embolism#917544
- Definite Stent Thrombosis in Comatose Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors#811908
Record · ID 1433264
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive