LSE Research Online
metadata only
Britannia ruled the waves
This paper uses new micro-level US data to re-examine productivity leadership in cotton spinning c. 1900. We find that output aggregation problems make the Census unreliable in this industry, and that Lancashire, not New England was the productivity leader for almost every type of yarn. This is true
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Accommodating agriculture within US capitalism: cotton, cooperatives, and intermediate credit in the early twentieth century#178262
- 7 U.S.C. § 603 — Government owned cotton; transfer to Secretary of Agriculture; powers of Secretary#562019
- Managerial Strategies of the Cotton South#499573
- Growth, profits and technological choice: The case of the Lancashire cotton textile industry#270920
- 7 U.S.C. § 51a — Extension of classification facilities to cotton growers#562525
Record · ID 1434657
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive