CanLII
metadata only
Hemmings v. Padmore
Decided: 2026-10-23. Docket: 41350. Citation: 2026 SCC 34 (CanLII). Civil liability — Negligence — Medical negligence — Factual causation and remoteness kept analytically distinct — “But for” test and counterfactual analysis in multiple defendant case — Reasonable foreseeability and “real risk” for anesthetic complications — Appellate deference and extricable legal error, Housen v. Nikolaisen — Appeals dismissed | Civil liability — Negligence — Factual causation — Nurse telephone advice — Whether “but for” causation found without addressing counterfactual — Competing expert evidence on what would have happened with earlier attendance — Misstatement of threshold by using “not far-fetched” — Legal error in failing to apply Clements v. Clements counterfactual — Action against Hospital dismiss
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 42 U.S.C. § 1992 — Speedy trial#593348
- Uncovering the Silent Victims of the American Medical Liability System#1019765
- R v Alleyne#1251762
- Peprah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1391006
- 42 U.S.C. § 11132 — Reporting of sanctions taken by Boards of Medical Examiners#590106
Record · ID 1435187
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive