Research Online
metadata only
CC BY-ND 4.0
Applying the best-practice principles and evaluation criteria for effective EIA follow-up governance–a case study of Malta
Building on recently published best‑practice principles and criteria for environmental impact assessment (EIA) follow-up governance, a multi-method qualitative approach is used to apply these at the macro (jurisdiction) level. Through documentary analysis, interviews, a focus group discussion and a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Role—Origin, Intrinsic, and Evolution#1334993
- Practice—The First Defense Line for Lucid Waters and Lush Mountains#1334989
- Protected areas: questioning the development-conservation system. A socio-political-economic and ecological framework for a bottom-up approach#1203432
- Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability#1235870
- From assessment to action: Linking biodiversity assessments and place-based conservation to support transformative change.#242951
Record · ID 1435693
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive