ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing IVF Using Luteal Ovarian Stimulation Versus Follicular Ovarian Stimulation
The investigators attempted to compare the clinical outcomes and cumulus genes expression in poor ovarian responders undergoing luteal ovarian stimulation or follicular ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization cycles.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Versus Modified Natural Cycles in Poor Responders#807361
- Follicular Phase Stimulation vs. Luteal Phase Stimulation in Patients Diagnosed With Suboptimal Response#1338217
- The Effect of a Dual Trigger on Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Reproductive Outcomes#913790
- Corifollitropin Alfa Versus Daily rFSH in the Controlled Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders#1370153
- Ovarian Stimulation With Recombinant Gonadotropins vs. Human Menopausal Gonadotropin in In Vitro Fertilization#1409472
Record · ID 1439044
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive