ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Guided Bone Regeneration With L-PRF in the Atrophic Maxilla - The GLAM Technique
16 patients with severe resorbed maxillae referred to Implantology Institute® will be submitted to full arch surgery, with simultaneous implant placement and regeneration in the aesthetic zone, with the GLAM technique. Informed consents and local ethical committee clearance will be obtained. Pre, post and 12 months' follow-up CBCT scans will be performed and 2 independent, calibrated operators will analyze the CBCT scans and mean bone values calculated. The distance from the nasopalatine canal to the center of each implant will be determined (4 different locations per patient, corresponding to implants 14; 11; 21; 24) and it will be the reference to other CBCTs. Implant length will be measured, from the neck (site 1) to the top and then a middle point will be assessed (site 2). Post-Surgical Volume (mm) will be determined from the most palatal point of cortical bone until the most buccal regenerated bone in each CBCT. Regenerated bone gain (mm) at post-op and at 1-year CBCTs will be calculated by the difference between pre and post-op or pre-op and 1 year CBCT measures, respectively. Regenerated Bone stability (%), defined as the percentage of regenerated bone at 12 months, will be calculated as the comparison between CBCT immediately after surgery and the CBCT at 12 months. Results will be presented as mean, with 95% CI.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mucograft Seal in ARP Follow-up#1279778
- To Compare Ridge Preservation Technique Using Leukocyte Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) and Freeze-dried Bone Allograft (FDBA) Layered Technique vs L-PRF/FDBA and L-PRF Alone in Influencing Quantity and Quality of New Bone Formation in Grafted Extraction Sockets#1093939
- Supracrestal Tissue Attachment Dimensions & Peri-implant Health#876812
- Tooth Roots for Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation#1009996
- Evaluation of Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation Using Xenograft Versus L-PRF Block Combined With Xenograft#1350116
Record · ID 1440479
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive