ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforation
Although laparoscopic repair (LR) of perforated peptic ulcers (PPUs) has long been accepted, clinical evidence comparing LR versus open repair (OR) remains lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and outcome of laparoscopic gastric repair and compare it with the outcome open repair by relying on a propensity score matching statistical technique
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) on C-reactive and Visceral Proteins#1125079
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer#878009
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease and the relationship with Helicobacter pylori#954943
- H. Pylori Eradication on Healing of Iatrogenic Gastric Ulcer by Endoscopic Mucosal Resection#889593
- GERD Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy#1309941
Record · ID 1445617
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive