ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison Between Xenograft and Extended PRF as Jumping Gap Grafting Material Versus Natural Healing of the Socket Without Any Material.
This study aims to clinically and digitally evaluate immediate implants placed in mandibular molar extraction sockets and compare the outcomes of xenograft, e-PRF, and no grafting material within the jumping gap.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Autogenous Sticky Bone Plus Platelet-rich Fibrin Membrane Versus Xenograft With Collagen Membrane for Posterior Atrophic Mandible#1243412
- Soft Tissue Evaluation Around Implants Using Prf or a Palatal Pedicle#1032166
- Immediate Implant Placement in Type ii Socket by Vestibular Socket Therapy Using Collagen Membrane#843999
- Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Xenograft Versus PRF#853096
- Ridge Preservation Using Xenogenic Bone Graft and Pre-hydrated Collagen Membrane#900230
Record · ID 1446395
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive