ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Clinical Application of Quantitative Major Imaging Features of CEUS LI-RADS
Liver cancer (LC) is the sixth most common malignant tumor and the third cause of cancer mortality in the world. According to the 2018 United States Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer, patients with HCC high-risk factors can be directly diagnosed by imaging if they have typical imaging signs, without the need for puncture pathological confirmation. Since 2011, United States the American College of Radiology (ACR) has successively launched Liver Imaging And Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) based-on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), contrast-enhanced MRI (CEMRI), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) , which have achieved good clinical diagnostic results and are constantly being updated and improved.LI-RADS provides standardized imaging diagnosis for high-risk populations and classifies each liver lesion into LR-1 to LR-5 (possibility of HCC), LR-M (probably or definitely malignant, but not HCC), LR-TIV (intravenous tumor). Although CEUS LR-5 has a high accuracy in diagnosing HCC, there is also a considerable proportion of HCC in CEUS LR-4 and CEUS LR-3. Studies have shown that CEUS LR-M contains a high proportion of HCC, the sensitivity of CEUS LR-5 in diagnosing HCC is relatively low, and the possibility of HCC cannot be ruled out if it is not classified as CEUS LR-5. Therefore, how to improve the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity is the key goal of CEUS LI-RADS. According to the CEUS LI-RADS diagnostic criteria, the key signs include arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) and washout. The guidelines divide washout into an early and late washout with 60 seconds after contrast agent injection. If the lesion present with a completely "black hole" within 2 minutes, it is classified as marked washout, otherwise it is mild washout. The current judgment of the degree of washout is based on the subjective decision made by the observer subjectively, which cannot distinguish the subtle differences i
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparative Study on the Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasound Contrast LI-RADS Grading and the German ESCULAP Standards for the Diagnosis of Recurrent Hepatic Mass Lesions After Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surgery#904615
- Contrast Enhanced (CE) Ultrasound and CE Computed Tomography or CE Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Liver Masses#812851
- Standardized CEUS Algorithms for Diagnosis of HCC - Prospective German Multicenter Study#1244153
- Gadoxetic Acid-MRI Versus Ultrasonography for the Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-risk Patients#1173271
- Utility of Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Screening Tool for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients#1161571
Record · ID 1446482
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive