arXiv (All)
open access
When Does Self-Supervised Pretraining Help Tabular Models? A Study of Label Scarcity and Missing Data
In this work, we conduct an empirical study on self-supervised learning (SSL) for tabular data. Our experiments examine limited label regimes (that is, 1%, 5%, 10%, and 20% of the labels) and highlight limitations and opportunities in current tabular SSL. Contrary to what is expected, our mask-and-r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Self-Supervised Learning: Paving the Way for Future AI Models With Minimal Labeled Data In#723695
- Self-Supervised Representation Learning as Mutual Information Maximization#1131415
- Your Self-Supervised Projection Head Captures Object Co-Occurrence Statistics#1388482
- Scalable Patch-Level Self-Supervised Learning#1234380
- Agreement-Gated Self-Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Image Classification#696242
Record · ID 1446716
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive