arXiv (All)
open access
Better Reward Models Are Not Always Less Biased: Social Alignment Beyond Standard Reward Benchmarks
Reward models are central to LLM alignment, yet current benchmarks reveal little about how they represent diverse and sometimes competing social preferences. We extend reward model evaluation to four socially consequential domains: bias, safety, morality, and ethical reasoning. Our analysis shows th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Two Minds Better Than One: Collaborative Reward Modeling for LLM Alignment#1386907
- Modeling Morality#775257
- From Constitutions to Control: Interpretable Rewards for Aligning Language Models#1117798
- An Evolutionary Model of Morality as Externalization#694878
- AutoRubric-T2I: Robust Rule-Based Reward Model for Text-to-Image Alignment#1389291
Record · ID 1448059
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive