arXiv (All)
open access
StemBind: When MLLMs Get Lost Between Rules and Instances in Abstract Visual Reasoning
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often know the rule but pick the wrong answer: on abstract visual reasoning (AVR) tasks, a model can describe what it sees and name the underlying pattern, yet still fail to choose the matching candidate. Existing AVR benchmarks cannot detect this because the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- VKnowU: Evaluating Visual Knowledge Understanding in Multimodal LLMs#925861
- GraphVerse: A Comprehensive Visual Graph Reasoning Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models#1297222
- What MLLMs Learn about When they Learn about Multimodal Reasoning#1447023
- DocHop: Benchmarking Out-of-domain Multi-hop Reasoning in Information-Dense Documents#822466
- ChemVTS-Bench: Evaluating Visual-Textual-Symbolic Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models in Chemistry#1048521
Record · ID 1448072
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive