HAL (France)
open access
Moralized authoritarianism in the Sahel: Theory, measurement and empirical evidence (20202025)
This article examines how contemporary authoritarian regimes remain stable despite weak economic performance, limited institutional credibility, and persistent crises. Explanations centered on coercion, material resources, or legal manipulation do not fully account for this durability. The article a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Authoritarianism in Action#131071
- No King, and Other Matters—America’s Perspectives in Mid-2026 on Democracy, Authoritarianism, and Election-Related Violence: Findings from a Nationally Representative Survey#1135939
- No King, and Other Matters—America’s Perspectives in Mid-2026 on Democracy, Authoritarianism, and Election-Related Violence: Findings from a Nationally Representative Survey#1135225
- Authoritarianism: A Clear and Present Danger#84329
- Legitimacy Inertia and the Centralization Trap: A Structural Account of Institutional Failure in American Law#181362
Record · ID 1449205
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive