ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Clinical Efficacy of Ceramic vs Resin Block Endocrown
Compare the comfort and durability of Ceramic (VITA,Suprinity ,VS) vs Resin Bloc (VOCO, Grandio Bloc,GB) Endocrown by chairside CAD/CAM system (computer aided design / manufacture). Objective:To provide information of material selection for the chair-side restoration of the teeth after root canal treatment.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Performance of Full Coverage Hybrid Ceramic Crowns in the Aesthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial#890470
- Clinical Evaluation of Lithium Disilicate and Hybrid Nano-ceramic Anterior Endocrowns (Randomized Clinical Trial)#1183144
- Evaluation of Clinical Wear and Surface Roughness of Partial Restorations Produced by Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Methods: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial#1261557
- A 3-Year Clinical Evaluation Of Endocrown Restorations With Two Different Materials#898206
- Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Inlays Versus Resin Composite Inlays in Vital Molars With Extensive Occluso-Proximal Cavities#1397118
Record · ID 1451350
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive