ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
MAC vs TIVA Ambulatory Breast Augmentation
hypothesis: the combination of LA with remifentanil and ketofol \[monitored anesthesia care (MAC)\] for ambulatory breast augmentation may result in results in better QoR on day of surgery as compared with total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA) . The purpose of this study was to compare the QoR after MAC using remifentanil and ketofol with TIVA during ambulatory breast augmentation .
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Ibuprofen Versus Ketorolac in Patients Undergoing in Orthopedic Surgery#916958
- Proper Dosage of Ketamine in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia#1059868
- Pupillary Dilation After Incremental Tetanic Stimulations Under Ketamine Sedation#832846
- Cyclopol on Electrophysiological Monitoring During Spine Surgery: a Randomized Controlled, Noninferiority Study#870219
- Comparative Study Between Single , Intra- Cluster and Double-injection Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block of Brachial Plexus#1112259
Record · ID 1451875
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive