arXiv (All)
open access
Good Scores, Bad Data: A Metric for Multimodal Coherence
Multimodal AI systems are evaluated by downstream task accuracy, but high accuracy does not mean the underlying data is coherent. A model can score well on Visual Question Answering (VQA) while its inputs contradict each other. We introduce the Multimodal Coherence Score (MCS), a metric that evaluat
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Rigel: Self-Distilled Score Adaptation for Image and Video Captioning Evaluation#1109090
- UReason: Benchmarking Reasoning-to-Generation Alignment in Unified Multimodal Models#798766
- UReason: Benchmarking Reasoning-to-Generation Alignment in Unified Multimodal Models#797352
- Putting Captions to the Test: Evaluating Video Caption Quality through Multiple-Choice Question Answering#996779
- Not Another Text Benchmark: Putting the "Visual" Back in Visual Question Answering for Large Video Models#1123503
Record · ID 1455386
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive