arXiv (All)
open access
Who Verifies the Verifiers? Accountable Semantic Consensus for AI-Mediated Web Information Verification
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly decide whether Web evidence supports online claims, often by voting over several assessors whose errors are presumed independent and benign. On the open Web, retrieved pages can steer the assessors that read them, and assessors from one model family fail tog
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Who Verifies the Verifiers? Accountable Semantic Consensus for AI-Mediated Web Information Verification#1450759
- FORGE: Form-Optimal Routing of Grounded Evidence for Frozen LLM Agents#1119431
- Verify Less, Evolve More: Training Idea-Level Critics for Verification-Efficient ML Evolving Agents#1233032
- The Shape of Ownership: Verifying LLM Provenance through Semantic Structures#924711
- The Shape of Ownership: Verifying LLM Provenance through Semantic Structures#920477
Record · ID 1456410
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive