arXiv (All)
open access
Do Words Matter? What Text Contributes to Few and Full-Shot Vision-Language Anomaly Detection
Vision-language anomaly detectors describe normal and abnormal appearance with text, and their gains are commonly credited to the semantic content of these descriptions. This attribution is plausible in the zero-shot setting, but few- and full-shot detectors interpose a trained visual adapter, and i
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Proximity-CLIP: Text-Guided Semantic Proximity Learning for Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection#975282
- One Geometry, Different Outcomes: Readout-Dependent Effects of the Modality Gap in Vision-Language Models#1130943
- When Less is More: Understanding When Token Filtering Helps and Fails in AI-generated Text Detection#799153
- When Less is More: Understanding When Token Filtering Helps and Fails in AI-generated Text Detection#797730
- Vision-language models see more about agriculture than they report, and test-time scaling remains bounded by parametric knowledge#1401843
Record · ID 1457764
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive