arXiv (All)
open access
Active Flux and Polygons: why a stabilisation and how to implement boundary conditions
In a recent paper, the authors developed an Active Flux-type algorithm for polygonal meshes (see \cite{BP_Pampa_VEM}). The main difference between Active Flux methods on polygonal meshes and those on Cartesian or simplex meshes is that the basis functions are not explicitly known. These functions de
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Regularized integrals and manifolds with log corners#357414
- DIHEDRAL ANGLE DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS: THERMODYNAMICS, STATISTICS, AND IMPLEMENTATION#200253
- Foliated Plateau problems, surface Radon transforms, and boundary area rigidity in dimension three#1077399
- A Cartesian grid-based boundary integral method for moving interface problems#155457
- Linear Robin-type Domain Decomposition scheme for Mixed Formulation of Richards' Equation#1062369
Record · ID 1457915
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive