arXiv (All)
open access
CalibraRL: Confidence-Calibrated Reinforcement Learning for Mitigating Hallucinations in RAG
Large language models (LLMs) often produce plausible but incorrect answers, motivating reinforcement learning methods that reward correct answers, penalize incorrect answers, and allow abstention. However, fixed outcome-based rewards do not distinguish incorrect responses with different confidence l
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Honesty over Accuracy: Trustworthy Language Models through Reinforced Hesitation#1216205
- When Guessing is Rewarded: Rethinking Language Model Evaluation with Distributional Uncertainty Scoring#1156215
- Quality-Controlled Reply and Summary Data for Post-Training Small Language Models in AI Call-Screening Agents#1400286
- IatroBench: A Pre-Registered Benchmark of Clinical Omission in Language Models#1077876
- CAST: Critique-Aware Supervision for Training Reliable Long-Horizon Tool-Calling Agents#799371
Record · ID 1458612
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive