arXiv (All)
open access
Knowing When to Escalate: Disagreement Patterns for Uncertainty-Aware Content Moderation
Agentic content-moderation systems increasingly rely on collective judgments from LLM agents, while aggregation methods commonly treat inter-agent disagreement as a reliability problem to be removed through consensus or voting. This framing is inappropriate for value-laden tasks, where disagreement
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why Disagreement-Based Skepticism cannot Escape the Challenge of Self-Defeat#772934
- Strategic Opinion Manipulation in Multiplex Networks#1037207
- Accurate but Not Humble: Evaluating Epistemic Humility in LLM Agents under Knowledge Conflict#1249784
- Accurate but Not Humble: Evaluating Epistemic Humility in LLM Agents under Knowledge Conflict#1242784
- The Epistemology of Disagreement: Why Not Bayesianism?#755598
Record · ID 1458805
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive