arXiv (All)
open access
Benchmarking uncertainty quantification for engineering regression under graded distribution shift
Machine learning models in engineering are often used beyond their training conditions, where reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) matters most. Existing comparisons of regression UQ methods rely on random splits, which assess calibration only in distribution. We introduce a three-rung shift lad
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reliable Uncertainty Estimation for Machine-Learned Multigroup Cross Sections Without Retraining#1233270
- Evaluating the Quality of the Quantified Uncertainty for (Re)Calibration of Data-Driven Regression Models#158779
- From Uncertainty to Failure Attribution: Self-Diagnosing Models for Failure Attribution under Distribution Shift#793835
- From Uncertainty to Failure Attribution: Self-Diagnosing Models for Failure Attribution under Distribution Shift#789829
- Shifts: A Dataset of Real Distributional Shift Across Multiple Large-Scale Tasks#1387885
Record · ID 1458826
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive