arXiv (All)
open access
From Self-Confidence to Statistical Accuracy: Scaling Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation with Direct and LLM-Assisted Auditing
For large language models (LLMs) and multimodal large language models (MLLMs), model-reported self-confidence is often miscalibrated, yet it may still be useful for efficient evaluation. At the same time, LLM-as-a-judge offers a scalable alternative to direct human auditing, but its practical benefi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LLM-CEG: Extending the Classification Error Gauge Framework for Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models#138851
- Attribution Bias in Large Language Models#1104426
- Inside the Scorer: Mechanistic Evidence on Rubric Control in LLM-Based Automated Essay Scoring from 25 Base Models#1400544
- Cite Pretrain: Retrieval-Free Knowledge Attribution for Large Language Models#1327236
- CaliDist: Calibrating Large Language Models via Behavioral Robustness to Distraction#1457315
Record · ID 1459168
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive