CanLII
metadata only
Borok v. Primmum Insurance Company
Decided: 2026-10-21. Docket: COA-25-CV-1701. Citation: 2026 ONCA 748 (CanLII). Insurance — Statutory accident benefits — Settlement approval — Insurance Act, s. 280 — Whether Superior Court lacked jurisdiction to approve SABS settlement under r. 7.08 — Distinction between disputes over entitlement or quantum and settlements — Automobile Insurance regulation, s. 9.1 considered — Appeal allowed, settlement approved | Professional responsibility — Paralegals — Scope of permitted services — Whether a lawyer must negotiate the settlement before swearing the r. 7.08 solicitor’s affidavit — Law Society of Ontario, By-Law 4, ss. 6(1)-(2) referenced — Paralegal negotiating SABS resolution permitted in non-catastrophic impairment — Appeal allowed, settlement approved | Procedure — Procedural fairnes
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The constitutional impact of strategic litigation in South Africa#1193997
- Uncertain Enforcement and Standing to Sue#387471
- Thiessen v. Thiessen Estate#1347097
- 38 U.S.C. § 1316 — Dependency and indemnity compensation in cases of prior deaths#587315
- The Wrong Way to Protect Small Business#711645
Record · ID 1459991
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive