CanLII
metadata only
Charapovich v. Charapovich
Decided: 2026-10-22. Docket: CA 548077. Citation: 2026 NSCA 78 (CanLII). Family — Divorce Act parenting orders — Best interests of the child — Sole decision-making authority to one parent under Divorce Act, s. 16.3 — Whether sole decision-making and parenting time at custodial parent’s discretion was in children’s best interests — High conflict, prolonged absences, and reunification counselling considered — Appeal dismissed in all parenting respects | Evidence — Expert opinion — Admissibility of reports — Whether parental alienation and vaccination reports were admissible as objective and non-partisan expert evidence — White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co. applied — Authors not called, no interviews of children or respondent, information from appellant only — Reports ex
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Suznevich v. Giesbrecht#1426162
- Harsh parenting and rs11621961 at the#9977
- Results of a pilot randomized controlled trial of Tuning in to Kids for children with FASD in nonbiological parent care.#135574
- 28 U.S.C. § 2072 — Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe#556819
- R v Russo#1166778
Record · ID 1460004
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive