PsyArXiv
metadata only
Do young children represent multiple mutually exclusive possibilities?
A prominent hypothesis in the literature on logical reasoning suggests that, unlike human adults and older children, 3-year-olds deploy a “minimal representation of possibility” when reasoning about the existence of a reward in one of two possible locations. On this view, children are unable to repr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do young children represent multiple mutually exclusive possibilities?#1450243
- Do young children represent multiple mutually exclusive possibilities?#1441902
- How do Beliefs Simplify Reasoning?#770083
- Pragmatic Development and the False Belief Task#776911
- An agent’s partial knowledge of a hidden array impacts infants’ representations of object quantity#477821
Record · ID 1460595
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive