ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Autogenous Bone Mixed With Xenograft Versus Xenograft Alone Versus Absorbent Gelatin Sponge
Alveolar bone atrophy post-extraction has been well documented in the past years. normal healing event results in a minimal loss of vertical height (around 1 mm), but a substantial loss of width in the buccal-lingual plane (4-6 mm). Alveolar socket preservation is thought to deal with this issue as to prevent the loss of alveolar bone dimensions post extraction in the case of delayed implant placement
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Immediate Implant Placement With or Without Buccal Bone Dehiscence#1150388
- Piezosurgical Buccal Plate Repositioning Technique for Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation#1010716
- Performance of Next-X in Alveolar Ridge Preservation#1228151
- Mineralized Dentin Graft Versus Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate for Alveolar Ridge Preservation#863243
- Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Tooth Graft Versus Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Graft.#905245
Record · ID 1463386
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive