ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Prospective Evaluation of Stapled Intact-Duodenum Bipartition With Sleeve Gastrectomy (SIBS)
Obesity is a chronic disease that can be treated with metabolic and bariatric surgery when appropriate. This study will prospectively evaluate a new laparoscopic bariatric procedure called Stapled Intact-Duodenum Bipartition with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SIBS). SIBS combines sleeve gastrectomy with a side-to-side connection between the first part of the duodenum and the ileum. Unlike standard single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S), the duodenum is not divided. Instead, the new connection is created while the duodenum remains intact, allowing food to continue through the normal duodenal pathway while also providing an additional pathway to the ileum. The connection is created laparoscopically using a conventional linear surgical stapler. The main purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the technical feasibility and short-term safety of the SIBS procedure in adults undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery. The study will assess whether the planned procedure can be completed successfully and will record postoperative complications occurring within 30 days after surgery. Participants will also be followed after surgery to evaluate weight loss, changes in body mass index, glycemic control and other obesity-associated medical conditions, nutritional status, gastrointestinal symptoms, hospital readmission, reoperation, and procedure-related complications. Follow-up assessments are planned for up to 12 months after surgery. The study is intended to provide prospective evidence regarding the safety, feasibility, and early clinical outcomes of this surgical approach. Longer-term and comparative studies will be needed to determine how its outcomes compare with established metabolic and bariatric procedures
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficacy and Safety of the Gastric Bypass Stent System on Body Weight and Metabolic Parameters in Obese Patients#1464355
- Early Feasibility for Safety & Device Functionality of SFM Anastomosis Device Used in 3 Procedures (SNAP-S) or (SNAP-PS) or (J-J)#874404
- Sleeve Gastrectomy With Jejuno-ileal Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass#1352944
- Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Management of Morbid Obese Patients: A Comparative Study#1073879
- Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Techniques for Revisional Bariatric Surgery#831839
Record · ID 1464637
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive