ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
14-day Quadruple Therapy Versus Triple Therapy in HP Eradication
In this prospective randomized-controlled study, treatment-naive H. pylori-infected patients are randomized to receive either standard triple therapy or sequential therapy. The aim is to compare the efficacy of concomitant quadruple therapy with standard triple therapy as a first line treatment for H. pylori infection in Tunisian patients.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficacy and Safety of Quadruple Therapy in Eradication of H. Pylori: A Comparison to Triple Therapy#201806
- The Efficacy of 10-day and 14-day Bismuth-based Quadruple Therapy in First-line H. Pylori Eradication#18626
- Sequential Therapy Versus Quadruple Therapy in H. Pylori Eradication#448291
- H. Pylori Treatment Between Modified Quadruple Regimen and Tailored Therapy#349994
- A Study on Eradication Rate of Triple Therapy According to Treatment Period and CYP2C19 Polymorphisms in H.Pylori Patients#1260777
Record · ID 1465180
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive