ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Which is Better Between Single Chest Tube and Multiple Tubes Drainage in Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax
There was no evidence that the number of chest tube do effect to the recurrence of pneumothorax, which placed after thoracoscopic wedge resection together with mechanical pleurodesis.This study evaluates the efficacy of single chest tube versus multiple tubes drainage in spontaneous pneumothorax after VATS bullectomy and pleurodesis. After routine procedure the participants will randomized to either placed single chest tube or multiple chest tubes
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Improved Drainage Strategy for Patients With Lung Wedge Resection#1409352
- Comparing Efficacy of Chest Tube Drainage and Needle Aspiration in Pneumothorax Treatment#844612
- Positive Airway Pressure on Pleural Effusion After Drainage#836564
- Safety And Recovery Of Tubeless Strategy In Uniportal VATS Wedge Resection#807062
- Study Compares Pneumothorax Recurrence: Absorbable Mesh vs. Pleurectomy in Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax.#1112027
Record · ID 1465198
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive