ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Development and Validation of Intraoperative Image-quality Criteria
An expert panel of surgeons agreed that there is not any established, standardized approach to the teaching of intraoperative imaging and that there may be practice gaps in decision making and the use of imaging among trauma surgeons. The panel is set to initiate a consensus-based evaluation process to develop a list of criteria for assessing images and would like to validate these criteria for differentiating good quality versus poor quality images in term of reliability and accuracy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficiency of Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography (iOCT)#891525
- Objective quality assessment of medical images and videos: review and challenges#1235300
- Surgical Procedure Efficiency Evaluation stuDy#854390
- Marginal Contrast Saturation-Based Intraoperative Scoring System Predicts Objective Response to DEB-TACE: Development and Validation of a CBCT-Derived Real-Time Score.#308777
- Impact of multislice CT on image quality and patient dose: Phantom study and multi-centre survey#279300
Record · ID 1466205
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive