arXiv (All)
open access
Can AI Guide Testing Without Generating Tests? A Comparative Study of AI-Assisted Unit Testing
Recent advances in generative AI have enabled assistants to generate increasingly sophisticated executable unit tests. However, novices may accept these outputs without independently identifying what to test, evaluating test-suite completeness, or verifying correctness, potentially limiting opportun
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- GTDD: Generative Test-Driven Development for AI Coding Agents with Adversarial Testing#1187630
- GTDD: Generative Test-Driven Development for AI Coding Agents with Adversarial Testing#1181706
- Benchmarking LLM Agents for Behaviorally Adequate Test Generation from Software Requirements#1467908
- NEUROTESTGEN: Neuro-Symbolic Guided Test Generation with Large Language Models#1078249
- An Empirical Study of Gemini 3 for Detecting Natural Language Test Smells in Manual Test Cases#1354181
Record · ID 1467509
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive