arXiv (All)
open access
Is Token Confidence Just Chain Length? A Signal-Processing Audit of Reasoning Traces
Reasoning language models answer math problems by writing long chains of thought, and sampling many chains per problem and taking a majority vote raises accuracy at a large cost in generated text. A popular way to cut that cost scores each chain by the model's confidence in each token it writes, whe
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DeltaTrace: Efficient Signed Attribution for Reasoning Language Models#1401069
- Probability is Not Enough: Exploring and Counting Divergent Tokens for Reasoning Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs#1142368
- Probability is Not Enough: Exploring and Counting Divergent Tokens for Reasoning Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs#1122327
- Every Token Leaves a Ripple in the Stream of Thought: Eliciting Model-Internal Token Saliency for Chain-of-Thought Compression#819093
- Every Token Leaves a Ripple in the Stream of Thought: Eliciting Model-Internal Token Saliency for Chain-of-Thought Compression#809101
Record · ID 1468033
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive