arXiv (All)
open access
Machine learning cannot decarbonise the subsurface until it can be audited
Geological CO2 storage, geothermal energy and underground hydrogen storage depend on irreversible or high-cost decisions made with sparse data and incomplete physical understanding. Machine learning (ML) increasingly informs these decisions, yet methods are usually judged on predictive accuracy rath
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Demystifying Machine Learning: Applications in African Environmental Science and Engineering#684900
- Differentiable modelling to unify machine learning and physical models for geosciences#1366348
- Robustness of Deep Learning Models for PV Power Forecasting under NWP Forecast Errors: A Spatiotemporal and Physically Interpretable Analysis#366243
- Ensemble machine learning method for δ(18)O prediction in groundwater.#305104
- Observational benchmarks inform representation of soil organic carbon dynamics in land surface models#1132943
Record · ID 1468190
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive