arXiv (All)
open access
Friction in AI-Assisted Clinical Decision-Making: A Case Study on The Role of Questions and 'What-if' Scenarios
A major challenge in AI-supported decision-making is achieving appropriate reliance on AI. To reduce overreliance on AI, approaches for cognitive friction have been proposed that promote reflection and critical thinking. In this paper, we investigate how two such approaches are perceived by medical
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems: An Ongoing Pursuit of Potential#335854
- Measuring what matters- patient and clinician priorities for clinical decision support interactions: a modified Delphi study.#1404335
- Continuous assurance for AI-driven clinical decision support systems.#449922
- AI Perceptions, Professional Identity, and AI-Supported Clinical Decisions Among Medical Students and Clinicians: Cross-Sectional Survey and Quasi-Randomized Vignette Study.#1374119
- Measuring undergraduate students' reliance on generative AI during problem-solving: Scale development and validation#1422987
Record · ID 1468250
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive