arXiv (All)
open access
Prospector: learning a compact graph traversal policy for scientific reasoning
Scientific reasoning in specialized engineering fields depends on knowledge scattered across the literature, often proprietary and absent from frontier LLM training data. In such domains, frontier models tend to give generic answers. Knowledge graphs (KGs) can ground LLM reasoning. Because a graph i
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Right Answer, Wrong Method: Shortcut Hacking Misleads the Evaluation of LLM Reasoning on Frontier Science Benchmarks#424014
- GraphCert: Bootstrap Agentic Graph Reasoning with Certified Evidence Rubrics#1143399
- From Concentration to Differentiation and Back: Routing Effective Rank in MoE Reasoning Cohorts#973982
- Sci-CoE: Co-evolving Scientific Reasoning LLMs via Geometric Consensus with Sparse Supervision#1423780
- Sage-A1.5: From Long-Horizon Execution to Scientific Exploration with Capability Composition#1412635
Record · ID 1468725
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive