HAL (France)
open access
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization: Propensity Score Analysis
ABSTRACT Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional biventricular pacing (BIVP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). While previous data suggest LBBAP may provide superior outcomes, existing evidence needs more data. Methods This
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Impact of Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias on Suboptimal Biventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy#908073
- Reprogramming to Prevent Progressive Pacemaker-induced Remodelling#1031525
- Efficacy and Safety of Leadless Pacemakers Versus Left Bundle Area Pacing - A Preliminary Exploration#849564
- AV Node Ablation and Pacemaker Therapy Compared to Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation - Pilot Study#1338472
- Posterosuperior Bundle Pacing for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Sinus Node Dysfunction#805850
Record · ID 1470094
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive