CanLII
metadata only
1866noentry.com Systems Ltd. v Surrey (City)
Decided: 2026-10-23. Docket: CA51495. Citation: 2026 BCCA 430 (CanLII). Procedure — Pleadings — Striking claims — Abuse of process under Supreme Court Civil Rules, r 9-5(1)(d) — Duplicative litigation and the Saskatchewan (Environment) v Métis Nation framework — Whether omission of the circumstances and intention to abandon duplication was an error in principle — Discretionary striking order set aside — Appeal allowed | Procedure — Stay — Related relief — Whether staying the Shimco lien claim pending the Small Claims Action was warranted — Shimco lien claim could not be adjudicated or enforced in Provincial Court — Stay flowed from erroneous abuse of process ruling — Stay set aside — Appeal allowed | Construction — Builders liens — Holdback and security — Builders Lien Act, ss. 4 and 24 —
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Nova Oculus Canada Manufacturing ULC v Sather#928690
- Shamattawa First Nations v. Canada (Attorney General)#1266819
- Nichols c. 6156231 Canada inc.#1360008
- Suppa Et Al. v. Canada (Attorney General) Et Al.#1079783
- Silva Estate (Re)#1360012
Record · ID 1471175
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive