CanLII
metadata only
MCAP Service Corporation v Klein
Decided: 2026-10-27. Docket: 2603-0229AC. Citation: 2026 ABCA 345 (CanLII). Procedure — Stay pending appeal — Enforcement of order — RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (Attorney General) test applied — Discretion to stay enforcement pending appeal considered — Serious question, irreparable harm, and balance of convenience addressed — Collateral attack concerns noted — Stay dismissed | Procedure — Stay pending appeal — Serious question — Whether appeal is arguable and not frivolous or vexatious — Reliance on affidavit of default accepted in earlier redemption order — Arguments characterized as collateral attack on redemption order — Serious question threshold not met on record — Stay dismissed | Procedure — Stay pending appeal — Irreparable harm — Whether applicant will suffer irreparable harm if s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R. v. Brown#1053802
- Akintade v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)#1066664
- Celik v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1219745
- Marlin c. R.#824293
- Sanderson c. Dyotte#1471172
Record · ID 1471177
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive