OSF
open access
Fact, Process, Accuracy: A Distractor Design Framework for Diagnostic Multiple-Choice Items in School Science
A conventionally scored multiple-choice item discards most of the information a student's response carries: a wrong answer is recorded as zero and the reason for it is lost. This report specifies Fact-Process-Accuracy (FPA), a distractor design framework in which every distractor of a single-tier it
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Determining the degree of randomness in multiple-choice question distractors#1156703
- Jerry A. Fodor, Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong#747463
- Science Is About Thinking: How Can We Protect Thinking Time in a Distracted Digital World?#412380
- Cognition Was Always the Bottleneck: Why AI in the Classroom Exposes a Curriculum Failure That Predates It#146566
- Visualizing cognitive processes in medical education: Forward and backward reasoning in a digital family medicine assessment.#330668
Record · ID 1471375
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive