arXiv CS
open access
Does More Thinking Pay Off? Reasoning Cost and Correctness of LLMs in Code Generation and Bug Fixing
Many LLMs now emit an explicit reasoning trace before they write code, but benchmark results for code generation and bug fixing usually report correctness alone. It is therefore unclear how much the extra reasoning contributes relative to the tokens it consumes. We examine this question with 866 Pyt
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does More Thinking Pay Off? Reasoning Cost and Correctness of LLMs in Code Generation and Bug Fixing#1468556
- PetriBench: Benchmarking LLM Reasoning over Dynamic State Spaces#1014930
- When is LLM-Based Program Reasoning Correct? A Completion Semantics for LLM-Based Code Inference#1084289
- Evaluating LLMs Code Reasoning Under Real-World Context#13159
- Improving the Energy-Efficiency of the Code Generated by LLMs through Effective Prompting#1186885
Record · ID 1473672
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive